Loss in a living system behaves nothing like a machine breaking down — a herd, a shoal, a culture, a crop, a microbial reactor. The damage starts out of sight, the threshold keeps shifting, and there is seldom a single right answer. ruru forecasts the hidden state, finds the optimal move within real limits, and shows the odds — in time to act.
Predict the risk · Optimise the response · Minimise the loss
The real fight is before you know it.
ruru exists for a specific kind of loss: where prevention costs a fraction of recovery, where most of the damage has no cure, and where by the time the loss is measurable it is already done.
Half the losses we work on never show on a gauge. So the data has to beat observation, the maths has to be right, and the recommended call has to be trusted enough that the right person acts on a threat they cannot see. Getting all three to hold is harder than any single forecast — and it's the whole job.
If you make decisions about a living system under uncertainty — or you carry the loss when it fails — one of these is you.
Disease, heat, frost and blooms cost you before you can see them — and biologicals only work in a narrow window.
Gill disease, oxygen crashes, thermal mortality and shifting stocks hit the pen or the quota before the signal is clear.
Your product works in the trial and fails in the field — because efficacy is context-dependent, and adoption stalls.
Bioreactor drift, contamination and potency loss show up after the batch is lost — and some batches are a patient's only dose.
You can design biology faster than you can trust it in the real world. Design is cheap; knowing how it behaves once released is not.
You carry the aggregate loss across many operators, but you see it only after it lands — in claims, in yields, in a die-off.
These are the six signs we look for. Few problems show all six, and we don't need them to. The more a problem shows, the more a decision layer moves the number rather than just dressing up a forecast.
The more of these a problem shows, the more forecasting plus optimisation moves the number. Where the fit is partial, we say so.
No rip-and-replace. We wrap your existing signals in a decision layer — and loop forecast and optimisation together, each improving the other.
Probabilistic, uncertainty-aware forecasting built for the sparse, noisy data you actually have — a few sensors, monthly tests, patchy trials, a district-blurred signal.
Constraint-based optimisation turns the forecast into the best action under your real limits — crew, cooling, product, cleanroom slots — re-optimised as the event unfolds.
Every recommendation arrives as evidence and a probability — never a bare number — so even a sceptical operator can act on a threat they can't yet see, and defend the call.
Forecast and optimisation are not a one-way pipeline. We loop between them, each improving the other, so the forecast is built to drive the decision. One shared engine across land, sea and introduced biology — the maths is the same; the fluency is specific.
Different systems, one mathematical shape. The industry can already sense something — a THI reading, a gill score, a bloom map, a bioreactor trace. What none of it delivers is the optimal action, early enough, under real constraints.
In hot, humid climates a confined herd sits above the heat-stress line much of the year. About half the milk loss is metabolic, and shows on no gauge. Forecast it pen by pen, then optimise cooling under a hard water budget where every litre is desalinated.
Spore load rises and silent liver damage accumulates weeks before any visible symptom. Forecast the spore-and-dose trajectory paddock by paddock, then optimise zinc, spore-monitoring and grazing moves against cost and toxicity limits.
Latent infection and frost injury are decided at bloom, hidden for weeks, and the kill-threshold keeps moving. Forecast block-level risk, then optimise which rows get scarce wind machines, heat or a spray first — under PHI and spray-count limits.
Amoebic and complex gill disease thickens tissue and degrades respiration well before fish show it. Forecast onset probability from sparse gill scores plus temperature, then schedule scarce freshwater-bath capacity before mortality climbs.
Stocks redistribute with a warming, shifting ocean, and the fishing-ground call trades catch against bycatch, quota and fuel. Forecast stock distribution, then optimise allocation under quota and access limits, trip by trip.
Cyanotoxin concentrates near a raw-water intake hours-to-days before routine sampling confirms an exceedance. Forecast breakthrough with calibrated lead time, then trigger pre-emptive treatment or intake switching before the limit is crossed.
A biological works in the trial and fails erratically in the field because efficacy is context-dependent. Forecast where and when it will actually work, then optimise application timing and placement — turning erratic results into a defensible recommendation.
Bioreactor drift, contamination and potency loss surface after the batch is lost — and a cell-or-gene batch can be a patient's only dose. Forecast batch trajectory early, then optimise the feed / harvest / hold / abort call under scarce cleanroom capacity.
*Loss figures shown are industry or published ranges for the problem, not ruru results. We never put a saved-loss number on a slide that your own data hasn't earned — that's what the retrospective below is for. Photography is illustrative.
Give us a season, a run of batches, or a set of past trials. We'll replay your own history with our optimiser in the loop — same budget, same teams, a different allocation — and show you, decision by decision, where ruru would have flagged the loss, how early, and what the best action would have been. If it wouldn't have helped, you'll see that too.
See the hidden state of a living system and act before the loss is visible — disease, heat, blooms, stocks. This is the applied work ruru already runs, extended across land and sea.
Before a new biological enters a living system — engineered, AI-designed, or not — forecast how it will actually behave: where, when, whether, and what could go irreversibly wrong.
One model of the living system, two questions: P(future | observe) to read it, P(future | do(introduce)) to estimate the interruption.
Our scientists sit behind the forecasting, optimisation and uncertainty methods that others build on — a combined 50,000+ citations on Google Scholar. We bring in domain specialists as a problem demands, led by a CEO who turns advanced science into tools teams trust and use.






Domain experts set the constraints; the team builds the maths. They prove each method in the open literature first.
The optimisation-under-uncertainty at ruru's core is published work, not a pitch. Our team co-authored the Predict+Optimize benchmark for renewable-energy scheduling — the same forecast-then-optimise shape ruru applies to living-system risk, which is why the method carries across problems.
Before we ask anyone to build on faith, we replay their own history with our optimiser in the loop — same budget, same teams, a different allocation — and show, decision by decision, what it would have saved against what actually happened.
If the number holds, there's a position worth funding. If it doesn't, we recalibrate before we build. We never put a saved-loss figure on a slide that real data hasn't earned.
Each scientist's full publication record is on their Google Scholar, linked in the team section above.
As AI makes designing biology cheap, the bottleneck becomes trust, test-selection and control — forecasting-and-optimisation problems, not generation problems. We start where the loss is immediate today, and the same engine carries forward.
The applied book across land and sea. Revenue, and a growing corpus of state→outcome data.
Forecast where and when a biological actually works — the gap throttling adoption.
Batch-reliability for bioreactors and one-shot cell & gene therapies.
The reliability, deployment & containment layer for organisms AI designs.
Every output is a probability with an interval, not a confident point. If we aren't sure, you see it.
Rights and use agreed before we start. The value we build on your data is yours.
The maths that optimises benefit could, sign-flipped, optimise harm. Introduced-agent work is access-controlled and dual-use aware.
A herd, an orchard, a catchment, a shoal, a batch, a release. We'll show you the hidden state, the best move, and the odds — on your own data, first.